They were only marked as "560fps" - and of course in nice over-sized type.

I'm not 'blaming' the border people in this case- they are looking at a label and getting, in my view, poor guidance from the CFC/FRT. It gets established there is no such thing as a "firearm" version of this product, but the RCMP refuses to remove the "firearm" classification from the records as it is advertised in the US as "560fps" even though it doesn't meet the Canadian requirement for "firearm".

And Sean, you're probably correct about this "interpretive" idea- I think this is the entire issue- allows for alot of leeway and confusion.


#$@#$$%